Saturday, August 22, 2026

Once We Repaired Things — Part 11 - Blocked

“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a harder battle.”

Plato

Then came the blocking. 

Another closed door.

Another place where I was trying to speak and somebody else had decided that I wouldn’t be heard.

Following everything I wrote about in Parts 9 and 10, this became another escalation in something that was already deeply distressing. I tried different avenues to communicate with Paul because I couldn’t live with the misunderstandings that had been left between us. I needed him to understand that there was another human being on the other side of all of this, with a history, feelings, memories and a life that was affected too. 


(See http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/07/once-we-repaired-things-part-9-midnight.html and http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/08/once-we-repaired-things-part-10-photo.html ).


But the avenues kept disappearing.


Blocked.


Blocked again.


And the more I was prevented from speaking, the more pressing the need to speak became.


That’s something I don’t think people necessarily understand.


Silencing somebody doesn’t necessarily resolve anything for the person being silenced. Sometimes it does the opposite. This was serious. 


For me, being unable to correct what Paul had misunderstood became tormenting. I was already trying to protect myself psychologically while everything else in my life was happening simultaneously. I was already overwhelmed. I was already frightened. I was already trying to survive circumstances that felt increasingly surreal.


I wasn’t trying to play a game.


I wasn’t playing a game at all.


Dating was never a game to me. Relationships weren’t a game. People’s emotions weren’t a game. My life certainly wasn’t a game.


And I hated the humiliation.


——


Humiliation Upon Humiliation


I have always hated being humiliated or shamed. See http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/01/my-personal-story-part-1.html regarding who I was as as child. And those who know me from childhood, would know this to be true. Perhaps that’s why, as an adult, I found myself to be a target of whatever this is. But I also believe that God doesn’t see us the way the world sees (or perceives) us. That’s a story for a future post. 


I also know that sadly, in life, we can’t always escape harm and humiliation being inflicted upon us, whether intentionally or unintentionally. But the last several years of my life, this harm has been next level, overwhelming and, as I mentioned, very surreal. 


I have tried throughout my life to treat people with kindness, dignity and respect. Yet during this period I’m writing about, I increasingly felt as though my kindness was being taken for granted everywhere I turned — as though other people somehow had an entitlement to decide what I could endure, what I should accept and when I was allowed to speak.


Paul may have believed something completely different was happening, and I accept that. In his mind, he may have constructed an entirely different explanation for why I kept trying to communicate.


But that was precisely why I needed a conversation.


He’d reached conclusions about me without allowing me to explain my situation. (And I myself wondered if his own past influenced his own judgements - see http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/02/once-we-repaired-things-part-2.html). 


Every attempt I made to correct those conclusions seemed to reinforce whatever conclusion he had already reached.


It became a trap.


The more I needed to explain, the more I tried to communicate.


The more I tried to communicate, the more I was blocked.


The more I was blocked, the more distressed I became because I still hadn’t been heard.


And then that distress itself could be interpreted as justification for refusing to listen.


Where was I supposed to go with that?


——


I Had a Story Too


There were things Paul didn’t know.


There were things about my history with men that he didn’t understand.


There were things about how I approached dating that he didn’t understand.


There were things about what had happened between us that I experienced completely differently.


There were things I needed to correct.


There were things I needed to say.


Because I was a person too.


My life was involved too.


My history mattered too.


My dignity mattered too.


My voice mattered too.


That became particularly painful after the message Paul sent me about himself and an ex-girlfriend. Whatever he intended by sending it, its impact on me was devastating. What compounded it was what I experienced as the absence of concern afterwards for how any of this had affected me. 


(See http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/04/once-we-repaired-things-text-that.html). 


I remember becoming extremely distressed. I became frightened for my own valid reasons. 


But underneath that distress and fear was something very simple:


Would you please listen to me?

——

His Fears Were Human. So Were Mine.


There’s something else that has stayed with me.


Paul had spoken about his own fears.


He feared being alone.


He had also watched his father deteriorate with dementia, something that would frighten and distress almost anybody who loved a parent.


Those fears were human and I understood them.


But loneliness frightened me too.


Loss frightened me too. See my own story about how I lost my own dad - http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2024/07/the-night-i-lost-my-dad-to-suicide.html


Watching life disappear frightened me too.


And somehow, while his fears were allowed to be real, I was living through circumstances that were leaving me profoundly alone while being denied the opportunity even to explain what was happening inside me.


That contradiction still hurts.


I would never deliberately do to Paul what I experienced being done to me.


I couldn’t knowingly watch somebody I’d cared about become increasingly distressed because they needed to tell me something crucial and I kept closing every door.


I couldn’t do it.


Whatever I thought they wanted, eventually I would have to ask:


Why is this person trying so hard to speak?


Maybe I have misunderstood something.


Maybe there’s something I don’t know.


Maybe I should listen.

——

The Parallel Was Becoming Terrifying


And this was happening while another extraordinary struggle was unfolding in my life.


At work, all I had originally asked for was a psychosocially safe working environment.


I couldn’t continue carrying what had effectively become two high-level jobs for the price of one person.


I asked for help.


What followed became years of trying to navigate an increasingly fragmented system.


Again and again, I found myself saying:


I am one person. I cannot carry all of this alone.


I was trying to:

  • Protect my employment.
  • Protect my home.
  • Protect my finances.
  • Protect my family from having to witness what I was going through.
  • Protect my health.
  • Protect my future.

And somehow I was also expected to navigate insurers, regulators, lawyers, government agencies and administrative processes while repeatedly explaining the same fundamental problem.


Listen.


Please understand what has happened.


Please do something.


Then, in my personal life, I was experiencing another version of the closed door.


Paul, please listen.


Please understand what happened.


Please let me speak.


Different circumstances. Different responsibilities. They should not be conflated.


But psychologically, for me, there was a terrible parallel:


everywhere I turned, I felt unheard.

——

Nowhere Felt Safe


That’s perhaps the hardest thing to articulate about this period.


I didn’t feel safe anywhere.


Everywhere I turned to try to reason with somebody seemed to become another place where I felt less safe.


At work.


Within the systems that were supposed to respond when something went wrong.


Within my personal life.


Eventually, even my home ceased to feel completely separate from everything happening outside it.


I don’t want to revisit everything that happened with police here because that belongs elsewhere in this story (and I’ve already written a post about that - http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/08/when-even-home-wasnt-safe-june-2022.html). But the progression is difficult for me to comprehend even now. 


I had asked for a safe workplace.


Eventually I found myself feeling unsafe even inside my own home.


How does somebody psychologically process that?


Where was I supposed to put the fear?


Where was I supposed to put the humiliation?


Where was I supposed to put everything I wasn’t being allowed to say?


——


What Trauma Does


I’ve had nightmares on and off since this began.


There were periods of shock and disorientation. My memory and concentration could become affected. Acute trauma doesn’t necessarily arrive neatly packaged as sadness. It can overwhelm the very cognitive processes somebody needs in order to explain what’s happening to them.


And yet explaining yourself is exactly what so many systems — and sometimes people — demand when you’re at your least capable of doing it.


Be calm.


Be concise.


Move on.


Accept it.


Stop talking about it.


But what happens when what you really need in order to regain some sense of agency is to finally be heard?


What happens when the suppression itself becomes part of the torment?


——


A Psychological Thriller I Never Chose


There were too many parallel stories unfolding at once.


Sometimes I have struggled to describe what this period of my life actually feels like.


The closest description I have is still this:


a surreal psychological thriller in which I’m the main character in a genre I never chose.


Except there’s  no audience watching from the safety of a cinema.


This has been my life, and I’ve been alone inside it.


Other people could finish work, go home, have dinner, watch television, make plans for the weekend and return to the ordinary problems of ordinary life.


I couldn’t switch mine off.


This followed me into my home.


It followed me into my sleep.


It followed me into my finances.


It followed me into my relationships.


It followed me into my sense of who I was.


And the cruelest part was that the more frightened and overwhelmed I became, the more difficult it became to make anybody understand the scale of what was happening.

——

What Kind of Society Are We Becoming?


These years have forced me to think about something much larger than my own circumstances.


When did we become so comfortable with simply shutting people out?


When did blocking replace difficult conversations?


When did administrative processing replace actual problem-solving?


When did protecting ourselves from discomfort become more important than asking whether somebody else was being harmed?


When did listening become such an unreasonable request?


Technology has made it extraordinarily easy to make another human being disappear.


Block.


Delete.


Ignore.


Move on.


Perhaps sometimes that’s necessary.


But we should also be capable of asking whether there are circumstances in which another human being deserves to be heard — particularly somebody with whom we have shared history, trust or vulnerability.


I was raised with strong family values. People mattered. Relationships mattered. Responsibility mattered. You didn’t simply discard people when things became uncomfortable.


Maybe that makes me old-fashioned.


I don’t care anymore.


I don’t want to live in a society where treating human beings as disposable is considered progress.

——

I Am Still Here


There’s another reason I’m writing all of this now.


I hope Paul finally reads it.


These posts can’t recreate a conversation that should have happened years ago.


But I finally get to finish my sentences.


I finally get to explain what he wouldn’t allow me to explain then.


And perhaps he’ll finally understand that what he thought was happening wasn’t necessarily what was happening inside the person trying to speak to him.


People are reading my story now.


Pieces of it, at least.


They’re learning things they didn’t know.


But even people who read it can eventually close the browser and return to their lives.


I still have to live mine.


That’s the difference.


The workplace story is still unresolved. The financial consequences are still real. The personal consequences are still real. The things that were unlawfully taken from me still require resolution and, where legally required, restitution.


And underneath every one of these parallel stories is something extraordinarily basic.


I asked for safety.


I asked to be heard.


I asked to be treated with dignity.


I asked for the same humanity and respect that other people expect for themselves.


I’m still asking.


And perhaps these are the questions I have been trying to articulate all along:


Where does the humiliation end?


Where does the silencing end?


Where does the abuse of power end?


And where, finally, does compassion begin?

Wednesday, August 19, 2026

When the NSW Government “System” Takes Everything - July 2022

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” Author unknown (but it’s been misattributed to Albert Einstein).

5–24 July 2022

By July 2022, I wasn’t just fighting to recover from a workplace psychological injury.


I was fighting to hold onto every part of my life that had once provided stability.


The damage had spread far beyond work.


The conflict and trauma that followed reached places I never imagined it could. Then came another loss that might seem insignificant to someone reading a file.


It wasn’t insignificant to me.


By July 2022, another consequence of everything that had happened was almost impossible to put into words.


I lost my GP.


Not because he retired.


Not because I chose to leave his practice.


After more than 35 years as his patient, his sister, who managed the practice, wrote to advise that he could no longer treat me.


I understood why.


It became another casualty of a crisis that should never have escalated this far.


My GP had known me since I was a child. He knew my medical history. He knew my family. He knew who I was before any of this happened.


There wasn’t even an opportunity for a proper goodbye.


No final consultation.


No sense of closure.


After everything else that had been taken, even losing the doctor who had cared for me for most of my life became another layer of grief.


They had cared for my family for decades. They were caught in something they neither created nor deserved.


But understanding it didn’t make it hurt any less.


I never had the opportunity for one final consultation.


No chance to say goodbye.


No opportunity to thank the doctor who had known me since I was a child, who understood my history long before any workplace injury or workers’ compensation claim ever existed.


When people think about the impact of workplace psychological injury (and a statutory “scheme” that doesn’t actually protect the statutory rights of workers), they don’t think about the ripple effects.


They don’t think about relationships collapsing under the strain.


They don’t think about family conflict.


They don’t think about trusted healthcare providers becoming casualties of a situation that should never have escalated in the first place.


Yet that’s exactly what happened.


On 5 July 2022, I wrote to my now second workers’ compensation solicitor explaining what had happened. I explained that I needed to find a new nominated treating doctor. I described attending an initial consultation with a new GP and trying to establish care all over again, while also arranging appointments with my nominated allied health professional, so I could obtain a Certificate of Capacity and simply restore some income.* 


Reading that email now, I don’t hear someone giving a routine update.


I hear someone desperately trying to rebuild the foundations of life one piece at a time.


I wrote:


“I managed to save my home but at huge loss that would never have happened had employer and insurer complied with worker’s compensation and WHS laws.”


And then the sentence that captured everything:


“For now I just need to get a certificate with some capacity to get my income back and the support to recover that I have been denied unlawfully for too long.”


That was all I wanted.


Just the lawful support that should have existed from the very beginning.


*No one had ever explained to me how the systemic “process” worked. Either they assumed I knew, or had withheld that information to disadvantage me. 



Two weeks later, on 19 July 2022, I wrote again to my solicitor.


By then I had begun sending packages of evidence to the Fair Work Ombudsman, documenting events dating back to 2 July 2019. Because repeatedly reliving the trauma was overwhelming, I explained that I could only send the material in stages.


I also asked a question that had been growing louder in my mind:


How does this system actually work?


I asked about the role of a barrister because I simply couldn’t understand why no one seemed prepared to examine the evidence as a whole.


I explained that this wasn’t a standard workers’ compensation dispute.


I wrote that I was experiencing mobbing and ostracism—not self-isolation—and that those distinctions mattered. I questioned where procedural fairness and natural justice existed when the evidence supporting my concerns appeared never to be properly reviewed.


On 22 July 2022, my solicitor replied that a barrister would only be retained if the matter proceeded to litigation before the Personal Injury Commission and that, at that stage, one was not considered necessary.


But that response didn’t answer the question I was really asking.


It wasn’t about whether another lawyer would become involved.


It was about why the system itself seemed incapable of seeing the complete picture.


So I wrote back on 24 July 2022.


I explained what had become painfully obvious to me:


“A big problem is a lack of cohesion between fair work / industrial relations law and worker’s compensation law. It leaves employees open to disadvantage, confusion and even manipulation…”


Those words still resonate today.


By that stage I had already gone through multiple lawyers.


Employment lawyers.


Workers’ compensation lawyers.


Industrial advice.


Yet every professional necessarily looked through the narrow jurisdiction they practised in.


Employment law.


Workers’ compensation law.


Industrial law.


Each piece was examined in isolation.


No one seemed able—or willing—to examine what happened when all of those systems collided.


That fragmentation became its own form of harm.



In that same email, I identified the central actors responsible for my situation: senior HR staff responsible for safety, the WHS manager, my union, the insurer, and managers within SIRA and SafeWork NSW. I questioned why serious complaints of workplace health and safety hazards appeared to be dismissed or trivialised and asked where the transparency was regarding the procedures that governed these decisions. I ended with perhaps the most important sentence of all:


“I need to understand how the process works.”


That sentence wasn’t written by someone trying to manipulate the system (others abusing their power were doing that).


It was written by someone trying to understand it.



I don’t believe the biggest problem was that individual organisations failed me.


It was that each institution could point to another.

  • The employer pointed to the insurer.
  • The insurer pointed to the Commission.
  • The Commission dealt only with certain issues.
  • SafeWork looked narrowly at workplace safety.
  • SIRA looked narrowly at scheme administration.
  • Industrial relations operated separately.
  • Employment law operated separately.
  • Regulators worked within their own legislative boundaries.


Each system saw only one fragment.


No one took responsibility for the whole.


And when nobody sees the whole picture, catastrophic harm can occur while every institution insists it has stayed within its own lane.


That is how people fall through the cracks.


Not because there are no laws, but because the system is so fragmented that accountability disappears between them.


That is why I am writing this. 


My story is not unique.


Too many workers enter these systems believing someone will eventually look at all the evidence.


Too many discover that every institution examines only its own small corner.


Meanwhile, lives unravel.

  • Families fracture.
  • Homes are nearly lost.
  • Trusted doctors disappear.
  • Careers are damaged.
  • Health deteriorates.

And all because someone had the audacity to ask for something every worker is entitled to:


A psychosocially safe workplace.


Source: contemporaneous record of events - Documents 430 & 436.



Reference: what psychosocial safety is supposed to look like


I want to finish this post with a Safe Work Australia infographic titled Managing psychosocial hazards at work, because it puts into remarkably simple terms what I had been asking for all along.


Safe Work Australia identifies psychosocial hazards including poor support, poor organisational justice, bullying, harassment, traumatic events, poor organisational change management and conflict or poor workplace relationships. It makes another important point: exposure to psychosocial hazards can cause both psychological and physical injury, and psychosocial risks are to be managed through a risk-management process just as physical workplace risks are.


The second page is perhaps even more significant to my story. It describes four steps: identify, assess, control and review. And underneath that process is something fundamental: consultation with workers. Safe Work Australia says psychosocial hazards can be identified by talking and listening to workers and by reviewing reports and records. Risks should then be assessed, eliminated where possible or otherwise minimised, with controls monitored and reviewed to ensure they remain effective.


That’s what makes this infographic so difficult for me to look at after everything documented in this story.

  • I was talking.
  • I was reporting.
  • I was putting things in writing.
  • I was producing records.
  • I was asking to be heard.

I was asking for the psychosocial hazards affecting me to be addressed so that I could be safe at work and recover in my job.


Instead, by July 2022, I was writing to yet another solicitor asking:


“Where is the procedural fairness and natural justice in this system?”


And days later:


“I need to understand how the process works.”


Meanwhile, the consequences had escaped the workplace altogether. They had spread into my finances, my home, my health, my family relationships and ultimately even a trusted medical relationship of more than 35 years.


That’s why psychosocial safety cannot be treated as a HR slogan, a policy document or something that matters only until somebody has been injured.


The Safe Work Australia infographic describes prevention and risk management: identify the hazards, assess the risks, control them and review whether those controls are working, with consultation with workers throughout that process.


My story isn’t simply about what can happen when prevention fails and an injured worker is then left to navigate fragmented systems after the damage has been done.


In my case, after I raised concerns about psychosocial safety, the response through the employer’s HR “processes” (who didn’t comply with their own policies and procedures), didn’t protect me from harm but instead subjected me to adverse action. That distinction is fundamental to my story.


And what happened at the beginning doesn’t excuse what happened afterwards.


Once I became injured by HR executives, “on behalf of the university”, there were still responsibilities and statutory processes that were supposed to operate. I continued trying to obtain the support, income, injury management and pathway to recovery that I was entitled to receive. If my employer wouldn’t do the right thing, I expected its workers’ compensation insurer, Catholic Church Insurance, to fulfil its own obligations within the workers’ compensation system. The existence of an injury didn’t erase those obligations, and it didn’t erase me.


This is one of the most important points I want this story to record:


I still assert my statutory right to recover in my job.


Recovery shouldn’t mean that an injured worker is written off, shuffled between jurisdictions or treated as though the injury has somehow diminished their value as a person or employee.


I am a human being.


I was a worker asking to be safe. When I was injured by HR, especially by the national manager of employment relations and SAFETY, I was still a worker entitled to be treated with dignity and to have the systems designed to protect injured workers actually operate.


That included “no contact” measures to be honoured, which they were not. Even when psychological guarding from the above HR individual was recorded on a legal medical document in this scheme, it was not respected by employer, insurer or any of the agencies and law enforcers I reported it to in this “system”. The harassment from the stressor continued. 


That’s also why the fragmentation matters so much. Workers’ compensation, work health and safety, employment law and industrial relations may occupy different legal and regulatory jurisdictions, but the human being caught between them doesn’t divide neatly into separate jurisdictions.


There’s only one me.


One life.


One job.


One family.


One home.


One health.


And while different organisations and regulators could look at individual pieces through their own limited lenses, I was living the cumulative consequences of all of them at once.


By July 2022, those consequences had reached even a medical relationship that had existed for more than 35 years.


Yet I was still trying.


Still producing records.


Still asking questions.


Still trying to understand the system.


Still trying to recover.


This should NEVER have been a legal battle.


I asked for a psychosocially safe workplace.


And after everything that followed, I still assert something that should NEVER have needed this much fighting to preserve:


my right to recover in my job.


Safe Work Australia. (2022). ‘Managing psychosocial hazards at work infographic’. [Online]: https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/infographic-managing-psychosocial-hazards-work