Friday, July 10, 2026

Once We Repaired Things – Part 9 - The Midnight Call


There are those moments in life that divide everything into before and after.

For me, one of those moments came just after midnight.

People often assume relationships end because of one argument. This wasn’t about one argument. It was about what happened when I tried to explain why I was hurting—and discovered there was no room for my voice.


By then, I had already spent months believing I had finally found someone authentic. Not another so-so.


After years of deeply confronting experiences trying to find a life partner, I wasn’t playing games.


I had just turned forty, and I knew exactly what I wanted.


I wanted honesty.


Loyalty.


Kindness.


Someone whose values reflected my own.


Someone with whom I could build a peaceful future.


Meeting people had become increasingly difficult. Too many experiences had left me questioning whether genuine kindness, integrity and emotional maturity still existed. Dating often felt confronting and, at times, unsafe. I had already written about one of those experiences in an earlier post.


Then I met Paul.


For the first time in a very long time, I genuinely believed I had met someone different.


For the first time in a very long time, I allowed myself to believe that perhaps I had finally found what I had been hoping for all those years.


For me, this attempt was my last hope.


But as I wrote in Part 4 – The Text That Changed Everything, one message sealed my fate. (http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/04/once-we-repaired-things-text-that.html). 


I didn’t expect certainty.


I didn’t expect life to be uncomplicated.


I expected honesty.


I expected that if something difficult arose, we would sit down together, talk openly, listen to one another and work through it with mutual respect.


Instead, everything became uncertain.


After Easter, Paul called and suggested we catch up for a coffee.


We had a genuinely pleasant conversation.


I told him about my upcoming trip to Italy in June.


He told me about his plans to travel later that year.


For the first time since receiving that text, I felt hopeful again.


I truly believed we would finally sit down together and have a conversation.


I needed that conversation. I needed to speak.


Then the communication began to fade.


Days passed.


Messages went unanswered.


I didn’t know what had happened.


Given everything I had already experienced in my life, I became genuinely worried that something had happened to him.


That fear wasn’t irrational to me.


Losing my father to suicide had changed the way I experienced silence.


I knew how suddenly lives could change.


I knew what it meant to lose someone without warning.


I was thinking, Is he alright?


I needed to speak with him. 


I needed to have the kind of conversation where two people listen.


Where each person has the opportunity to explain what they’re feeling.


Where questions are answered with honesty instead of assumptions.


That conversation never happened. This happened instead - http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/06/once-we-repaired-things-part-8-honey.html


Now with a new level of trauma and eggshell walking, I kept repeating, “Let me speak.”


Instead, my phone rang just after midnight.


That phone call was never about trying to understand each other.


Before I had even finished my first few sentences, it became painfully clear that there would be little room for what I was trying to say.


By the time the call ended, I had lost my voice.

Everything I had been carrying—my fears, my history, my grief, the reasons I needed to be heard—was left exactly where it had been when the phone first rang.


Only now I was carrying something else as well.


The shock of realising that the conversation I had waited for was not going to happen.


By the time the phone rang, I was already frightened.


I’d already been humiliated and degraded. 


I already felt as though I was disposable.


I had spent days trying to find the right words.


I was already walking on eggshells, because I was afraid that if I said one wrong thing, the opportunity for an honest conversation would disappear altogether.


The first words I heard were,


“What’s going on!?”


It wasn’t the question that frightened me.


It was the tone.


Before I had spoken more than a few words, I knew this wasn’t going to be the respectful conversation I needed.


I kept trying to explain.


I kept trying to ask questions.


I pleaded,


“Let me speak.”


But every attempt was abruptly cut off before I could finish. I felt intimidated, unsafe. I was already traumatised and demeaned. How was I supposed to speak under more hostile conditions? 


During that midnight call, Paul told me he didn’t know what he wanted (then he should have spared me my last hope because I knew exactly what I wanted). 


He told me his ex had liked something about him (I was competing with ego). 


He said he regretted not speaking with me, but that he still would have done what he did because he had a history with his ex;


(although I chose not to relive and write example after example of my history with men and dating, I did write about one, just before I met Paul - http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/12/men-dating-point-where-tolerance-ends.html). 


Those words hit me one after another.


Like emotional stones.


Each one landed before I had the chance to respond to the one before it.


I remember sitting there trying to understand why that mattered so much when everything I had valued in him suddenly seemed invisible.


The man I believed I had come to know—the man I believed was kind, authentic, gentle and emotionally honest—felt as though he had disappeared.


In his place was someone I no longer recognised.


Perhaps that was one reason the experience affected me so deeply.


Growing up, I had already witnessed what outside interference could do to families.


I had seen how quickly trust could unravel.


How relationships could change.


How people could become strangers to one another.


Whether that was what was happening here or not, my nervous system recognised the feeling immediately.


It felt frighteningly familiar.


I remember him saying that I went “nana” (I don’t know which of these two incidents Paul was referring to - 

  1. http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/04/once-we-repaired-things-text-that.html or
  2. http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/06/once-we-repaired-things-part-8-honey.html - 

but what about http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/02/once-we-repaired-things-part-2.html). 


At one point I asked why he thought I had become so upset.


“I don’t know… maybe you were jealous!”


I remember gasping.


That single word erased everything I had been trying so desperately to explain.


Growing up, I’d already witnessed the damage jealousy could do to families and relationships.


I’d spent much of my life trying to be the opposite of that.


To trust.


To care.


To communicate honestly.


Yet in one sentence I became a stereotype before I had even been heard.


Later, I tried to explain why I’d reached out.


I told him I had been genuinely worried about him. I had feared something had happened.


His response stopped me cold.


“I don’t know why you cared! We weren’t dating!” (He was yelling every answer at me). 


Those words landed like a physical blow.


They came after weeks of believing we would meet for coffee.


After a warm conversation about Italy.


After believing we were still going to sit down together and talk.


I needed to speak! We were dating before that text message! It was my life too! And for me, it was my last hope! And it’s NOT who I am! But I have to live with it for the rest of my life! 


I wasn’t embarrassed because I cared.


I was heartbroken that caring itself seemed to require justification.


I had shown compassion regarding the loss of his father to dementia.


I understood what it meant to lose a parent, even though my own experience had been very different.


Yet when I explained why I had become so frightened, there seemed to be no curiosity about what experiences had shaped that fear.


No attempt to understand.


No opportunity for me to explain.


I wasn’t trying to control him. I wasn’t demanding anything from him.


I was frightened.


I was relieved to know he was alive.


I simply wanted the conversation we had never been allowed to have.


Instead, I found myself trying to justify why I cared at all.


The conversation became louder.


More hostile.


At one point the phone connection broke up.


“I can’t hear you,” I said quietly. 


“I’m talking as loud as I can!!!”


That wasn’t what I meant.


I wasn’t criticising him.


I simply couldn’t hear him.


Even that became another reason for the conversation to escalate.


Paul wasn’t talking. He was yelling at me.  


I became more distressed because I couldn’t get a sentence out.


Every time I tried to explain what was happening inside me, I was interrupted and shut down.


Every attempt to slow the conversation down only seemed to move it further away from understanding.


Then came the words that still haunt me and echo inside me.


“Move on!!!”


Move on?


Move on to what?


Move on from what I believed was my last opportunity to build the life I had always hoped for?


Move on to accepting that perhaps I would never know what it felt like to have someone truly beside me?


Move on to watching other people build families, memories and ordinary happiness while quietly grieving the life I had hoped might still be possible?


What did Paul expect me to “move on” to, again?


(Let’s look at the modern dating experience for women - https://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/02/my-personal-story-part-2-there-is-no.html?m=1 )


Before I could answer, he ended the conversation.


“Leave me alone!”


The line went dead.


We hadn’t reached any understanding. We hadn’t resolved anything.


The conversation ended because I was no longer allowed to speak.


I sat there in silence, shaking, gasping for air. 


I have never forgotten that feeling.


It isn’t simply that I struggled to get a word in.


It’s that I stopped feeling recognised as the person Paul was getting to know.


I lost my voice because I couldn’t finish a sentence.


But I also felt as though I lost my identity.


The woman who valued honesty, loyalty, compassion and genuine communication disappeared behind assumptions that never reflected who I am.


Once someone has reduced you to a stereotype, it becomes almost impossible to have a real conversation, because they’re no longer responding to you. They’re responding to the person they’ve already decided you are. 


(Eg. https://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/10/interlude-mrs-harris-goes-to-paris.html?m=1 ).


The next morning, I somehow had to get dressed and go to work.


I sat around boardroom tables trying to contribute to meetings while fragments of that midnight phone call replayed over and over in my mind.


“Maybe you were jealous!”


“I don’t know why you cared!”


“Move on!”


“Leave me alone!”


“My ex liked something about me…I regret not speaking with you but I still would’ve done it because I had a history with my ex!” 


(But we did have an opportunity to speak…after we’d both calmed down and thought rationally. What happened instead was this : https://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/06/once-we-repaired-things-part-8-honey.html?m=1).


That midnight call has given me nightmares all these years. 


Again.


And again.


And again.


Going back to immediately after that midnight call, I fought back tears while trying to appear composed at work.


Everyone needed something from me professionally.


I kept giving.


To work.


To other people.


To the relationship I believed I was building.


But nothing seemed to come back to fill me up.


What frightened me wasn’t simply the possibility of losing someone I genuinely really cared about and mutually had strong feelings for. 


It was the confronting realisation that this was my future.


That this had been my last hope and it was thrown into the garbage after Paul decided who I was, without actually knowing, and truly getting to know, who I was. 


Who I am. 


That after everything I had already survived, I’ll never experience the quiet joy of sharing an ordinary life with someone who genuinely walked beside me.


Not someone who controlled me.


Not someone who dismissed me.


Not someone who overrode my voice.


Someone who listened.


Someone who respected me.


Someone who chose to work through life’s difficult conversations together.


I was grieving the possibility that I might never experience that kind of partnership.


This grief has never left me.


This grief is too much. 


That midnight call was the first time I realised how profoundly frightening it is when someone you’ve trusted has already decided there is no need to hear the rest of what you have to say.


Years later, when I found myself pleading to be heard in entirely different circumstances, that same feeling would return.


Different people.


Different circumstances.


The same desperate plea.


“Please…


…let me speak.”


All the while, I had been repeating those very same words to Paul…



To be continued…



Links to:

Other parts of my personal story. The real person behind Paul’s stereotype. 


http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/01/my-personal-story-part-1.html


As for my own history, there are plenty of posts on this blog. 

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

Letters From The Brink – May 2022

26–28 May 2022

By late May 2022, I was no longer writing emails because I believed someone would suddenly discover compassion, courage, or integrity and intervene.


I was writing because I was running out of places to turn.


The events of 9 May 2022 had broken something in me.


For six months, I had been pleading for help. I was asking for help regarding serious workplace misconduct, psychosocial hazards, retaliation, workers’ compensation non-compliance, and the complete failure of a statutory system that was supposedly designed to protect workers from harm.


Instead, I found myself sitting alone in my car outside the Kogarah electorate office, sobbing, frightened, and feeling utterly abandoned.


As I wrote only weeks later:


“I sat in the car on 9 May, parked outside the Kogarah electorate office, sobbing profusely, frightened and alone, finally feeling completely helpless and uncared for and betrayed.”


That captures the reality better than any retrospective account ever could.


I had spent months trying to engage with my local state MP, Chris Minns. Months of emails. Months of requests. Months of hoping that someone in a position of authority would at least listen.


What I received instead felt like another chapter in a pattern that had become painfully familiar.


People would express concern.


People would tell me they understood.


People would imply they wanted to help.


Then, somehow, their own interests would take priority, and I would be left behind.


Again.


And again.


And again.


By May 2022, I was watching opportunities for political advancement, institutional reputation management, and strategic relationships take precedence over a worker, an electorate constituent, whose life was unravelling in plain sight.


I had become expendable.


What made it particularly painful was that I wasn’t simply fighting an employer.


I was fighting for my livelihood, my home, my health, my surviving family, and my future.


The consequences were no longer theoretical.


I was supposed to settle on my home.


Instead, I was facing the possibility of losing everything.


The deposit.


The stamp duty.


The years of sacrifice.


The dream of finally having security.


In one of those emails, I wrote:


“I was supposed to have settled in owning my home on Friday 27 May.”


That single sentence carried years of effort, sacrifice, and hope.


Every delay mattered.


Every day mattered.


Every failure by institutions to act had real-world consequences.


And yet those consequences were being carried entirely by me.


By this point, I had exhausted avenue after avenue.

  • SafeWork.
  • SIRA.
  • The NTEU. 
  • Political representatives.
  • Internal university governance.
  • Workers’ compensation processes.

The people and organisations who were supposed to intervene had either failed to act, deferred responsibility, or simply disappeared behind “process”.


The result was not merely “administrative failure”.


It was human suffering.


I’ve spent twenty years serving an institution that spoke about dignity, community, justice, compassion, and human flourishing.


I’ve dedicated myself to students, colleagues, and the university community.


Yet when I became injured and vulnerable, those values seemed to vanish.


The language remained.


The reality did not.


I found myself asking questions that no worker should ever have to ask.


If the Catholic Church values life, why was I being left in circumstances that were destroying mine?


If workplace safety matters, why was nobody enforcing the obligations that already existed?


If dignity matters, why was I being treated as disposable?


If compassion matters, where was it?


I genuinely want answers.


The desperation in my emails during those days reflected the reality of my circumstances.


By late May, the situation had become so overwhelming that I found myself writing:


“I don’t want this negligence to end up taking my life.”


Those words were written because I was frightened.


I was exhausted.


I was carrying trauma that exceeded anything I had experienced before, including the devastating loss of my father to suicide.


That is a difficult statement to write, but it is true.

  • The constant uncertainty.
  • The financial pressure.
  • The social isolation.
  • The humiliation.
  • The betrayal.


The feeling of being trapped in a system designed to protect institutions rather than people.


Together, they created a level of fear that is difficult to adequately describe.

  • I was trying to survive.
  • I was trying to return to work safely.
  • I was trying to preserve my home.
  • I was trying to protect my family.
  • I was trying to recover from an injury.

And I was trying to do so within systems that seemed determined to ignore their own statutory obligations.


One of the most painful aspects of this period was thinking about my father.


My father was a lifelong Labor supporter.

  • He believed in fairness.
  • He believed in workers.
  • He believed in looking after ordinary people.

I often found myself wondering what he would think if he could see what was happening.


Not only what had been done by my employer and insurer, but the indifference that followed from so many others who had the power to help and chose not to.


In one email, I wrote:


“It wasn’t just disrespect toward me. It was a let down and disrespect toward my late father, a Labor supporter through and through.”


That was not political.


It was personal.


The one time his daughter desperately needed help, I felt as though everything he had believed about fairness and standing up for ordinary people had been abandoned.


His death by suicide had already left a permanent wound in our family.


The events of 2022 reopened many of those wounds.


The difference was that this time I was facing the crisis alone.


What these emails capture is despair.


They capture what happens when someone spends years trying to do everything properly, follows every process available to them, seeks help through every official channel, and discovers that none of those channels are prepared to act.


Those emails were distress signals.


They were written by someone desperately trying to stop further harm.


What remains most troubling is that the issues I was describing were never confined to my own circumstances.


I believed then, and I believe now, that there are systemic failures within workplace, regulatory, workers’ compensation, and governance systems that allow people to disappear into a void once they become “inconvenient”.

  • A worker reports harm.
  • A worker becomes injured.
  • A worker challenges misconduct.
  • A worker loses income.
  • A worker becomes isolated.
  • And eventually, the worker is expected to disappear quietly.

I refused to disappear.


That refusal has come at an enormous cost.


But these emails remain an important record of what was happening in real time.


Not after the fact.


Not with hindsight.


Not after years of reflection.


They capture the reality of what it feels like when every door appears to be closing, when fear begins to overwhelm hope, and when the people and institutions who should have stepped forwards instead step away.


Perhaps the line that best captures where I was emotionally at that point is one of the final pleas I wrote:


“Can someone please save me. I want to recover in my work as per injury management plan and enterprise agreement. I want to live like a dignified human being.”


They were the words of a worker who had spent nearly three years trying to be heard.

  • A worker trying to save her home.
  • A worker trying to save her family from more trauma.
  • A worker trying to save her life.

In late May 2022, I was still asking one simple question:


Would anyone finally listen before it was too late?


Source: contemporaneous record of events - Documents 339-340.


——


Further Reading


Power, C.A. (2023). ‘Just Hit Me Already: Obscured Workplace Abuse and Discrimination.’ ADVANCE Journal 4(1). https:/ / doi.org/ 10.5399/ osu/ ADVJRNL.4.1.10.


A thought-provoking paper I’ve read while documenting my own experience is “Just Hit Me Already: Obscured Workplace Abuse and Discrimination” by social psychologist Cathleen A. Power.


Although the paper is based on the author’s own workplace experience, many of the concepts she explores resonated strongly with my own journey.


Power describes workplace abuse that leaves “invisible bruises”—psychological injuries that can be every bit as devastating as physical injuries, yet are often dismissed because they are harder to see or prove. She examines how workers who raise legitimate concerns can experience retaliation, isolation, and what researchers call institutional betrayal: the failure of the very organisations and systems that are expected to protect them.  


One of the themes that resonated most deeply with me is the way the paper describes how the person reporting the harm can gradually become viewed as the problem rather than the harm itself. The focus shifts away from investigating misconduct and instead turns towards questioning, scrutinising or blaming the worker who spoke up.  


That theme has echoed throughout my own experience.


After reporting psychosocial hazards and seeking a safe workplace, I expected the regulatory system to investigate whether employers and insurers were complying with their legal obligations. Instead, many of my experiences with the systems responsible for worker protection left me feeling that the focus had shifted onto me rather than the conduct I was reporting.


For me, some of the deepest trauma didn’t come only from the workplace itself. It came from experiencing secondary harm while trying to engage, in good faith, with the very systems responsible for preventing further harm. I continued documenting, continued reporting, and continued hoping that someone within those systems would recognise the ongoing psychosocial risks and intervene before more damage was done.


This paper offers a valuable framework for understanding why psychological workplace harm can become so difficult to escape when institutions fail to recognise, investigate or respond appropriately to reports of harm.


Themes that resonated with my own experience


While every workplace and every case is different, several themes explored in this paper closely reflect patterns I have documented throughout my own story.


Invisible bruises


Power describes psychological workplace abuse that leaves no visible injuries, making it difficult for workers to demonstrate the extent of the harm. My own psychological injury developed over years through cumulative psychosocial hazards, retaliation, prolonged uncertainty, financial pressure and ongoing exposure to workplace conflict. There was no single dramatic event that captured the full extent of the harm. Instead, it was the accumulation of repeated experiences that ultimately caused profound psychological injury.


Institutional betrayal


The paper explores institutional betrayal—when organisations and systems that people reasonably expect to protect them instead contribute to further harm. Throughout my experience, I repeatedly sought assistance from my employer, workers’ compensation insurer, union, regulators and other oversight bodies, believing they would investigate my concerns and ensure compliance with legal obligations. Instead, I experienced compounding harm as the processes themselves became an additional source of trauma.


Retaliation for speaking up


One of the strongest parallels for me was the author’s discussion of retaliation after raising legitimate workplace concerns. My injury began after reporting psychosocial hazards and seeking a safe work environment. Rather than seeing those hazards effectively addressed, I experienced years of continued conflict while trying to exercise rights that were intended to protect workers raising health and safety concerns.


When the complainant becomes the “problem”


Perhaps the most confronting theme in the paper is the observation that attention can shift away from the reported conduct and towards the person reporting it. There were many occasions where I felt that the focus moved from investigating the psychosocial hazards and workers’ compensation issues I had raised to questioning, scrutinising or responding to me instead. That shift caused profound secondary trauma.


Listening theatre


Power describes what she calls “listening theatre”—processes that appear to invite consultation or feedback but ultimately result in little meaningful change. Throughout my journey, I attended meetings, lodged complaints, prepared extensive documentation, responded to requests for information and engaged with multiple parliamentary inquiries because I genuinely believed those processes existed to resolve problems. Too often, however, the experience felt procedural rather than protective, leaving me with the sense that I had been heard without meaningful action following.


Willful ignorance


The paper also examines willful ignorance—the active avoidance of uncomfortable information that challenges existing assumptions or institutional interests. I spent years documenting events, preserving records and providing evidence because I believed careful documentation would assist those responsible for investigating my concerns. Yet I felt significant aspects of that evidence were overlooked, minimised or not meaningfully engaged with, despite the serious issues I was attempting to raise.



Reading this paper helped me understand that researchers are increasingly examining patterns of workplace abuse, institutional betrayal and psychological harm that extend well beyond any one individual case. While this paper is not about my circumstances, it provides a thoughtful framework for understanding why psychosocial injuries and institutional responses can become so complex, and why workers can experience further harm while seeking help from the very systems established to protect them.