The Home I Was Trying to Secure — And What It Cost Me - It started in December 2021

I have worked in a secure, full-time, continuing role since 2001. When I tried to buy my home, what I did not have was the income I was legally entitled to rely on.

By late 2021, I was doing what anyone in my position should have been able to do. I was speaking with agents, reviewing contracts, organising finance, and preparing to move forward into home ownership. It was not a rushed decision or an overreach. It was the natural next step after decades of stable employment — the kind of history lenders rely on, the kind that should make this process straightforward.

I wrote at the time, that “settlement would be like another word for peace.”  

That was the truth of it. Not an investment. Not a strategy. Just peace. A place where things could stabilise after everything that had already begun to unravel.

Nothing about that moment should have been fragile. The work history was there. The capacity was there. The pathway into home ownership was clear. But at the exact point I was trying to secure that future, the stability I had built over decades was being undermined.

It began when I exercised a right that is meant to be protected — requesting a safe workplace. That request, grounded in Work Health and Safety, should have triggered protection. Instead, it triggered adverse action.

——

A safe workplace is a legal right — not a trigger for retaliation.

What followed did not correct that harm. It compounded it.

Once I entered the workers compensation system, the mechanism that is supposed to preserve financial stability did not function as it should have. The income I was entitled to was not properly maintained. The Injury Management Plan that had been agreed was not implemented. There was no coordinated return to work. No proper engagement with my treating practitioners. No structure ensuring that my financial position remained intact while I recovered.

And this is where the consequences become real.

When you are trying to secure finance, stability is everything. Income is not just money — it is capacity. It is credibility. It is the basis on which your future is assessed.

——

Remove income at the point someone is seeking finance, and you remove their future with it.

I had spent more than twenty years building that foundation. What I relied on, at that moment, was that the system designed to protect injured workers would preserve it.

Instead, it allowed it to erode.

The weekly payments I was legally entitled to receive were not properly provided. Those payments are not discretionary. They exist to replace income and maintain financial stability so that an injured worker is not pushed into financial distress at the point they are most vulnerable. They exist so that obligations can be met and opportunities — including the ability to obtain finance — are not lost.

Without that stability, the consequences are entirely foreseeable.

And they were foreseeable here.

Those in positions of responsibility were aware of what was happening. The issues had been raised. The financial harm was not hypothetical — it was unfolding in real time. And still, there was no meaningful intervention to stop it. No correction. No compliance with the statutory obligations that exist to prevent exactly this outcome.

——

This was not delay. This was the removal of financial stability at the exact moment it was needed most.

I did ultimately reach settlement. I did secure my home.

But that does not undo what it took to get there.

The cost was significant. Financially, in ways that should never have occurred. Psychologically, in ways that are difficult to quantify. Structurally, in that the stability I had built over decades was not protected when it mattered most.

There is something deeply wrong about having to fight that hard to secure something that, on every objective measure, should have been within reach.

I had the work history. I had the capacity. I had the foundation.

What I did not have was the protection of a system that was legally required to provide it.

And so I secured my home despite that system, not because of it.

Not just a property - a place of stability, safety and peace.

I did not lose the home — but I was forced to pay for it in ways the law was supposed to prevent.

To be continued…

Source: contemporaneous record of events - Documents 238-240.