Q Workplace Solutions used as a reason to continue the harassment and badgering

On 10 June 2020, JFMLAW received an email from R. Christmann outlining that my complaint was being independently investigated by Q Workplace Solutions. 

Remember, I had already done a legitimate independent investigation report for Catholic Church Insurance dated the day before, the 9 June 2020. How quick were they, in sending R. Christmann a copy. 

Incident #24 states what Rena Christmann did and said, and that I wanted her to stay away from me and my family. 

And yet again, are employment lawyers devoid of basic knowledge of the workers compensation processes? I’m the target of harassment. Was I meant to just know things without being informed? Am I meant to continue to have “unrealistic expectations” placed on me, years later after finding myself a target of serious systemic abuse, collusion and corruption? 

If employment lawyers knew that insurers get a signed statement of a factual investigation report, they could have shut this shit down with Q Workplace Solutions. 

There was no investigation by Q Workplace Solutions. It was not done according SafeWork Australia’s (2016) guidelines. See https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/doc/guide-preventing-and-responding-workplace-bullying

The only thing Q Workplace Solutions did was check my LinkedIn profile (before the trauma from systemic abuse was obvious, which was their evil collective goal). The LinkedIn community are my witnesses now to something that is a serious crisis in our workplaces, with systemic “failures” and serious abuse happening globally. 

There was no contact with me in my complaint at all. In this letter, Ms. Christmann rejects my edited version of my initial complaint submitted on 23 October 2019. 

Readers, I was so cognitively exhausted and impaired from the relentless harassment and malicious intent, I only had clarity to reflect on things later. If HR had seriously wanted to take my initial grievance of bullying, discrimination and harassment seriously, which was a legal obligation, they would have done so from when I was fobbed off to them by the associate director in my unit. 

Again, with what right did Christmann “reject” my complaint, regardless? Employment lawyers, do I need to tell you it’s called procedural fairness and my right? Not that procedural fairness was the motive of this perpetrator, but I found myself paying legal fees for a middle man, passing on information, not protecting me, not defending my rights or truly representing me. 

Rena Christmann continued to label me as “unfit” and employment lawyer #3 seemed to just accepts this too. How dare my human right to a voice be illegally and repeatedly denied, and lawyers I paid to represent me, just allowed it to happen. 

For that matter, how arrogant and negligent of these large law firms to make assumptions and hand my case to their young inexperienced solicitors. 

And why was it suddenly acceptable to R. Christmann to use my written complaint submitted on 23 October 2019 (allegedly)? Why didn’t they investigate as per policies and regulations at that time, but decide to spread malicious and vexatious lies and threaten me in adverse action? 

Also, the complaint submitted to multiple parties (including my GP / NTD) on 23 October 2019, had only one name mentioned - the person I initially raised a grievance regarding bullying, discrimination and harassment. I did not mention the names of other staff. 

The report after the “alleged” investigation by Q Workplace solutions included the names of staff. Therefore, Rena Christmann has also lied about using my bullying complaint submitted on 23 October 2019. Coming up in a later email from R. Christmann, is a mention of the “detailed statement” she had evidently been given access to and used from Catholic Church Insurance. 

This one included staff names, but it was a violation of my privacy by Catholic Church Insurance and their pledge and agreement to abide by Australian Privacy Principles. It was also a violation of the privacy of other individuals mentioned. 

These are the discrepancies and “slip ups” from such pathological liars, that nobody picked up. 

The cause of injuries were predominantly from Ms. Christmann herself. She would continue to taunt and relentlessly harass me under workers compensation regulations. No one I reported it to protected me, including St. George police, the registrar of the local court decided not to list my APVO application because it “sounded like a work issue with a colleague” and referred me to the Fair Work Ombudsman (who were the office I called and they advised me to report the matter to police, who then advised me that my only option was an APVO application). 

This was to become the start of systemic abuse. This was the start of being sent in frustrating and distressing cruel circles, and greater harm to my safety from those I trusted to keep us safe. The NTEU, SafeWork NSW, SIRA NSW were all negligent too (and still are), breaching their own policies and core responsibilities and campaigns they are so vocal about. 

This post is based on documents 72-73.