By 29 April 2022, I was running out of options.
For months I had been raising concerns about insurer misconduct, employer failures, the collapse of my recovery at work, and the complete absence of meaningful regulatory intervention. My financial situation was deteriorating rapidly. My health was deteriorating. My future was becoming increasingly uncertain.
What I received in return was another letter.
Another referral.
Another closed door.
In response to correspondence sent to the Minister for Customer Service, I received a response from SIRA’s Associate Director of “Customer Service” and “Operations”, advising that my concerns had already been addressed and directing me instead to contact the NSW Ombudsman.
There was no acknowledgement of the seriousness of the issues being raised. No indication that anyone intended to investigate the underlying failures. No recognition of the escalating harm that was occurring while agencies passed responsibility from one desk to another.
This is how gatekeeping works in practice.
Not through overt refusals.
Not through a regulator explicitly stating that they will not act.
Instead, concerns are redirected. Complaints are recategorised. Correspondence is “treated” as already answered (when no substantive answer has been provided). People are sent elsewhere. The process becomes the outcome.
The result is that serious matters never reach the level of scrutiny they require.
What struck me most was not simply the referral itself.
It was the complete absence of humanity behind it.
By this point I was not a routine complainant seeking clarification about a process. I was a psychologically injured worker raising concerns about insurer conduct, employer conduct, and regulatory failures that were causing significant and escalating harm.
I had repeatedly explained that I was in distress. I was isolated. I was frightened. My financial situation was deteriorating. My health was deteriorating. I had lost faith in the very institutions that were supposed to protect workers when things go wrong.
Yet the response was simply to send me somewhere else.
Back to another agency.
Back to another form.
Back to another process.
Back to another person who knew nothing about the history, nothing about the workplace, nothing about the university sector, and nothing about the increasingly apparent cultural and governance problems that exist within large institutions when power is left unchecked.
I was trying to navigate a situation involving a large employer, a specialised insurer, multiple legal representatives, and regulators unwilling to address serious failures of statutory compliance.
The very purpose of risk management, governance, and regulation is supposed to be ensuring compliance with legal obligations and protecting people from harm.
Instead, I found myself trapped inside a system where responsibility seemed endlessly transferred but never exercised.
What makes this particularly troubling is that the complaint itself concerned failures by those very institutions. I was not seeking assistance with an unrelated matter. I was raising concerns about failures of injury management, failures of recovery at work, failures to comply with statutory obligations, and the significant harm being caused by those failures.
When a person has lost trust in a regulator because of their experience with that regulator, sending them elsewhere is not a solution. It is procedural deflection.
And when that person is vulnerable, isolated, frightened, and already experiencing significant psychological distress, the deflection itself becomes another source of harm.
The assumption behind these responses appears to be that people can simply continue navigating increasingly complex complaint pathways indefinitely. That they can keep retelling traumatic experiences to new agencies, new officers, and new decision-makers without consequence.
But every referral carries a cost.
Every referral requires the person to revisit events that may already be causing them significant distress.
Every referral communicates that nobody is prepared to take responsibility.
Every referral reinforces the message that protecting processes has become more important than addressing harm.
What I was experiencing was not customer service.
It was procedural abandonment.
A person facing powerful institutions should not have to fight every institution alone while those same institutions repeatedly direct them elsewhere.
That is not accountability.
That is a system exhausting the person until they give up and possibly die.
By April 2022, the financial consequences were already becoming severe. My ability to maintain financial stability was increasingly under threat. The regulatory failures were no longer abstract administrative concerns. They were having real-world consequences.
What nobody appeared willing to acknowledge was that regulatory inaction is not a neutral act.
When regulators fail to intervene in circumstances where intervention is required, harm continues.
Financial losses accumulate.
Health deteriorates.
Trust collapses.
People are left exposed to the consequences of conduct that should have been addressed.
The letter itself was brief.
The consequences were not.
Years later, the financial records tell their own story. The losses became measurable. The health impacts became measurable. The consequences of allowing complaints to be endlessly redirected instead of properly investigated became measurable.
What was presented as a customer service process was, in reality, a system that prevented serious matters from being escalated to where they needed to go.
The greatest danger of poor complaints handling is not that complaints are rejected.
It is that people are slowly worn down by a process that appears designed to move responsibility rather than exercise it.
What stands out is not merely regulatory failure.
It is the extraordinary lack of humanity shown towards a person who was asking for help while being crushed by the consequences of that failure.
The referrals kept coming.
The harm kept growing.
And accountability remained somewhere else.
——
Final Reflection
What I find remarkable looking back on this letter is the date.
29 April 2022.
The very same day this response was being written, my local member for Kogarah, then Opposition Leader Chris Minns, was visiting my university employer and meeting with the Vice-Chancellor at the Blacktown campus.
The irony is difficult to ignore.
The reason I had gone to my elected representative in the first place was because the regulators were not regulating.
SafeWork NSW was not enforcing compliance.
SIRA was not enforcing compliance.
The very agencies established to oversee workplace safety, workers compensation, injury management and recovery at work had failed to provide protection when it was needed most.
I was not asking for a change in the law.
I was asking for the existing law to be followed.
I was asking for statutory obligations to be enforced.
I was asking for the protections built into the workers compensation system to function as Parliament intended.
Instead, I found myself being referred elsewhere.
Again.
And again.
And again.
By April 2022, I’d reached the point where I no longer believed the regulators would protect me. That loss of trust was the product of repeated experiences where serious concerns were minimised, redirected, or left unresolved while the harm continued to grow.
That is why I approached my local member. Because when the regulators responsible for enforcing compliance fail to act, where else is a citizen supposed to go?
What happened next, and the role played by my elected representative and others, is something that will unfold as my story continues.
But it’s important to remember this.
When institutional failures occur, they are never experienced by just one person.
They ripple through families.
They affect parents.
They affect siblings.
They affect partners, friends and entire support networks.
When one family member is left exposed to prolonged harm, the consequences are carried by everyone who loves them.
My family are also constituents of the Kogarah electorate.
They watched what was happening.
They raised concerns.
They sought help.
And like me, they were looking for someone, somewhere, to intervene before the damage became irreversible.
For now, I leave readers with another piece of the story from that very same day:
Solemn Expressions and Social Media Posts – 29 April 2022
https://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-social-media-post-i-saw-on-29-april.html?m=1
Because sometimes the most revealing moments are not found in official letters.
They are found in what was happening around them.
Source: contemporaneous record of events - Document 330.
——
For what I was put through by SIRA NSW up to this point, see also:
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/01/sira-nsw-when-system-sends-you-in.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/01/sira-nsw-when-system-is-silent-harm-is.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/01/when-regulators-close-ranks-systemic.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/02/please-dont-neglect-us-what-i-asked-of.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/02/sira-nsw-closed-my-complaint-phone.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/03/sira-nsw-and-illusion-of-regulation.html
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/04/sira-nsw-regulator-that-didnt-regulate.html
And the degrading doozy:
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/04/is-it-safe-to-open-what-that-question.html
And yet the SIRA NSW senior complaints manager, claims they take complaints seriously! Put on record, in the same record they wrote that the complaint was closed, again. While repeatedly shutting down my very serious complaint, with no investigation, no compliance and no enforcement on the other key stakeholders: namely the university employer and its specialised insurer!
http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/05/we-take-complaints-seriously-sira-nsw.html
Imagine if I had stolen over $1.2 million from my public university employer or insurer! Isn’t this same conduct in my direction also fraud? This financial damage is ongoing. That total is on the conservative side of the estimated financial damage, as reported to APRA and now also provided to SIRA NSW.
https://www.sira.nsw.gov.au/workers-compensation/fraud
Yet I’m still begging SIRA NSW for my legally owed weekly payments to be enforced, to begin with, for some immediate financial relief, under a statutory scheme, that should have been provided by Catholic Church Insurance from at least mid-2020!
SIRA NSW and SafeWork NSW have been barriers to my statutory right to recover safely in my job! What is that?!
