I Asked My Local MP, Chris Minns, to Listen: The Records from October 2021 to October 2022

 “The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born.” – Warren Bennis

The two documents reflected on in this post preserve part of the written record of my repeated attempts to obtain help from my local NSW member of Parliament, Chris Minns, the Member for Kogarah and then Leader of the Opposition.

I wasn’t approaching his office over a minor disagreement. I was reporting what were serious failures within the NSW workers compensation and work health and safety systems. I was asking for help to obtain safety, accountability, implementation of my Injury Management Plan and a return to my substantive work.

I wanted to recover safely in my work, with my workplace rights and accrued entitlements protected.

The records show that my approaches were not confined to one email. They continued over many months while my psychological and financial circumstances deteriorated.

——

15 October 2021: “Does anyone truly care?”

The chronology begins on 15 October 2021, when I emailed the Kogarah electorate office after trying unsuccessfully to obtain meaningful assistance from the agencies responsible for regulating workers compensation and workplace safety.

I wrote:

“I have to ask you honestly. Does anyone truly care? Have I any value, in return for everything I’ve contributed to our society and to those I worked with or supported in teaching, learning and research?”

I asked whether public commitments to mentally healthy workplaces and effective government regulation were genuine. I also asked the office of Mr Minns to review the evidence and meet with me.

My email explained that the principal document provided to me under workers compensation arrangements was an Injury Management Plan dated 25 June 2020. This plan had not been implemented, with no cooperation from employer and insurer to do so. 

I wrote:

“Once you’ve reviewed the evidence, please consider calling me for a meeting to discuss. But please don’t delay for too long. I need to go back to my work.”

I finished with the words:

“Please listen because nobody has so far.”

That was not political theatre. It was a direct request from a constituent seeking help.

——

November 2021: my requests became increasingly urgent

By 9 November 2021, I was describing the profound effect that the continuing situation was having on me:

“No one has been there for me, being the one time I needed support, and I don’t know if I’ll survive the torture and victimisation much longer if someone doesn’t end it.”

Between 11 and 16 November 2021, I sent further communications to the Kogarah office. I explained that I had approached state agencies, the union, lawyers, police and the court system, yet I was still left unprotected.

I wrote:

“I’m still being victimised and no one is making it stop.”

I identified the practical outcomes I was seeking:

“I want my workers compensation entitlements that were withheld provided and to return to my job. I want my long service leave and annual leave and so much personal leave taken while they victimised and threatened me, to be recredited.”

I also made clear that I wasn’t  prepared to accept a narrative that erased my long record of capable service:

“I’ve worked in my job for twenty years and now I’m suffering discrimination.”

The request to my MP’s office was direct:

“I need to return to my job safely asap. SIRA is not doing their job. Can I get support from my local MP with this?”

Between 22 and 28 November 2021, I continued asking for help:

“Please help me before it’s too late.”

I again stated what I needed:

“I need my job and implementation of the injury management plan asap.”

These were written warnings that my position was becoming increasingly dangerous—psychologically, physically and financially.

——

December 2021 to February 2022: the correspondence continued

From 1 to 10 December 2021, I copied the Kogarah electorate office into further correspondence in which I tried to hold SIRA and SafeWork NSW accountable.

Between 11 and 23 December 2021, I continued writing because the financial consequences were becoming more severe. My home was at risk.

The correspondence continued throughout January and February 2022. By then, I was exhausted and traumatised. My objective had nevertheless remained consistent: implementation of the Injury Management Plan, restoration of the entitlements that had been depleted or withheld, regulatory accountability and a safe return to my substantive role.

This wasn’t a person changing her demands from one day to the next. 

It was a worker repeatedly asking for the same fundamental protections.

——

March and April 2022: public commitments and private inaction

During March 2022, I became increasingly distressed by what I saw as a stark gap between public political messaging and my experience as a constituent.

Mr Minns was publicly presenting himself as someone who listened to workers and cared about safe workplaces. Yet I still hadn’t had the meeting I had repeatedly requested, nor received any meaningful account of what action had been taken in response to the extensive material I had provided.

In April 2022, I continued sending emails to the electorate office and to university governance.

I wasn’t asking my local MP to determine a legal dispute personally. I was asking him to examine evidence concerning the conduct of NSW regulators, raise those matters through the proper parliamentary and ministerial channels, and help a constituent reach the bodies capable of taking action.

——

9 May 2022: the human consequences of not being heard

On 9 May 2022, I attended the Kogarah electorate office after learning that Mr Minns had met with the University’s Vice-Chancellor.

I wasn’t given a transparent account of whether my situation, my workplace rights or the failures I had reported had been discussed.

I was told by Cheryl Han, an electorate-office staff member:

“I don’t think they’re going to give you your job back.”

That statement terrified and humiliated me. My job and 20 years of accrued entitlements and benefits never passed on under workers compensation regulations (ie. Fraud) should NEVER have been stolen as the most immoral and horrific adverse action to begin with! 

Not to mention that wasn’t the purpose of a local MP’s office. I went there for help regarding the failures of two state regulators - SafeWork NSW and SIRA NSW! That’s within the remit of the office of an elected representative! 

I had sought a safe return, implementation of the Injury Management Plan and compliance with the obligations applying to my employer, insurer and the relevant regulators.

After leaving the Kogarah electorate office, I sat in my car outside in the rain. I was alone, overwhelmed and frightened about losing my home and the effect this would have on my family.

The second document records how close I came to not surviving that moment. I include this because it demonstrates the foreseeable human consequences when a traumatised constituent repeatedly asks for help and experiences only silence, delay or dismissive messages.

——

3 October 2022: questions about parliamentary work

On 3 October 2022, The Australian published an article titled “ALP MPs condemn leader’s work rate.”

The article reported criticism from unnamed Labor MPs about Mr Minns’ parliamentary activity before becoming leader. It stated that, during his first five years in Parliament, he had delivered 172 speeches, compared with 401 by Yasmin Catley and 363 by Jo Haylen. It also reported that he had served on one parliamentary committee during his first two terms and attended 55 per cent of that committee’s meetings.

One former Labor MP was quoted as saying:

“As an MP, he was shocking. He was just biding his time to become leader.”

Another reportedly said:

“He was not across the detail. He didn’t seem to be doing too much.”

The article also included a defence of Mr Minns from another Labor source, who said the criticism shouldn’t be given much credence. (?)

I read the article through the lens of my own documented experience. I had repeatedly asked my local MP to examine detailed evidence concerning SIRA, SafeWork NSW and the WHS / workers compensation system. I had provided a box file of records to his electorate office. Yet I had no evidence that those records had been substantively examined or used to pursue accountability.

——

10 October 2022: World Mental Health Day

On 10 October 2022—World Mental Health Day—I wrote directly to Mr Minns, the Kogarah electorate office and others.

I expressed anger and distress about the failure to respond meaningfully to what I had reported. I also questioned the contrast between public statements about workplace safety and my experience as one of his constituents.

A public statement attributed to Mr Minns said:

“But they all deserve a government that listens to their concerns and takes action.”

My response was:

“As a constituent in your electorate, I banged on the door trying to have you listen for six months.”

Another of his public posts, responding to the Broderick Review, stated:

“We all need to do better and make sure that we’re making every possible effort to make the NSW Parliament a safe workplace.”

Those words expressed an important principle. My question was why the same principle didn’t appear to extend to a constituent reporting serious psychosocial hazards, regulatory failures and escalating risk.

In another public post, Mr Minns stated:

“No one should face what these workers face every day.

No workers compensation. No leave. No access to fair rates and conditions.”

My written response explained that workers compensation protections already existed in law, but my contention was that they hadn’t been implemented or enforced in my case.

I wrote:

“I asked for assistance for compliance to ensure the attached legally binding agreement was implemented. That’s all.”

Whatever view is taken of the distressed language in my emails, that sentence captures the essential request.

——

The acknowledgement I received

The Office of the Leader of the Opposition sent an automated acknowledgement:

“Your email is important to us, please be patient while we address your concerns. You will receive a response in due course, if appropriate.”

The documents contain the acknowledgements. They don’t contain a substantive response from Mr Minns addressing the evidence, the Injury Management Plan, the conduct of the regulators or my requests for assistance.

——

11 October 2022: one request, stated plainly

On 11 October 2022, I wrote again to the electorate office.

I asked whether other constituents were treated as I had been when they visited the office seeking help. I repeated that I required assistance concerning the financial harm and the entitlements that had been withheld.

Again, I reduced the issue to its core:

“I asked for assistance for compliance to ensure the attached legally binding agreement was implemented. That’s all.”

——

14 October 2022: documenting the full pattern

On 14 October 2022, I sent a detailed chronology to Mr Minns, the Kogarah electorate office and The Australian.

The email was titled:

“Evidence of my repeated attempts for Mr. Minns to listen to me as a constituent and what ultimately happened”

It traced my approaches from 15 October 2021, through November and December 2021, January and February 2022, March and April 2022, and the crisis I experienced in May.

By then, this was no longer simply a request for help. It was also a record showing how many times help had been requested.

——

What these records establish

These documents verify something fundamental: I repeatedly asked my local state MP for help. I identified the agencies involved. I described the risks. I supplied documentary evidence. I asked for a meeting. I asked for regulatory accountability. I asked for implementation of the Injury Management Plan and a safe return to the work I had never left.

My distress wasn’t hidden. Neither was the escalating financial danger.

The language in some of my emails was raw because I was writing from inside an unfolding crisis. It should be read in that context. Distressed communication isn’t evidence that the underlying concerns are unworthy of examination. Often, it’s evidence of what prolonged exposure to institutional inaction can do to a person.

——

Listening must mean more than acknowledging receipt

Political leaders frequently say that every person deserves a government that listens.

See this as a prime example: http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-social-media-post-i-saw-on-29-april.html

Listening, however, isn’t an automated acknowledgement. It isn’t accepting a box of documents and leaving the person who supplied them unable to determine whether anyone has examined them. It isn’t making public statements about workplace safety while a constituent reporting workplace harm remains unheard.

Genuine listening requires engagement, transparent communication and appropriate action. It also requires respect. I didn’t feel respected by the office of my local MP for Kogarah, Chris Minns. At all. 

I’ve worked honourably at ACU for approximately two decades. I asked to be kept safe. I asked for my existing Injury Management Plan to be implemented. I asked to return to my substantive work with appropriate safeguards. I asked that the regulators responsible for protecting injured workers be held accountable for their conduct.

Above all, I asked my local representative to listen.

The written record shows how often I asked.*

Source: contemporaneous record of events - Documents 539-540.

*My story has plenty of posts regarding the Kogarah Electorate Office of my local member. Readers can go back to 15 October 2021 onwards. There’s also an entire series titled Notice After Notice. 

All this could have been avoided if there was some integrity, honesty, empathy, work ethic, authentic leadership, common human decency and respect for constituents from my elected representative. 

I learned the hard way about “politics” and why our votes matter come election time. 

⸻

Reference

Maddison, M. (2022, 3 October). “ALP MPs condemn leader’s work rate.” The Australian. Gale OneFile: News.

When Dignity Becomes the Question - September 2022

9–23 September 2022

There are moments in a long struggle when separate parts of a story suddenly converge: family, work, faith, culture, grief, mental health, justice and the question of whether the values an institution publicly professes are actually lived when somebody is suffering.

September 2022 was one of those moments for me.

Two emails I wrote that month were separated by only two weeks. Reading them together now, I can see the same question running through both:

What does human dignity mean if it disappears precisely when a person most needs it?

——

9 September 2022: In memory of the Queen and my parents’ citizenship, loyalty and contribution to Australia

On 9 September 2022, the morning after the death of Queen Elizabeth II was announced, I wrote to Professor Hayden Ramsay at ACU.

This wasn’t really an email about monarchy.

It was about my parents.

It was about migration, sacrifice, loyalty, service, education, faith and filotimo — the deeply held Greek value that encompasses honour, dignity, generosity, responsibility and doing what’s right because it’s right.

I asked ACU to recognise what its treatment of me had also meant for my family:

“I really need ACU to show respect to my parents, their sacrifices, hard work, loyalty, filotimo and contribution to our country.”

I spoke of my parents’ service to Australia and their belief in education - educating their children so that we could use the gifts we had been given and contribute to society.

And I connected that history directly to what I was asking of my university: dignity, restoration and the return of what had been taken from me after approximately twenty years of honourable service.

My request was explicit. I sought reinstatement and continuity and the restoration of what I was entitled to, consistent with the mission, values and ethos I had served.

——

Why the Queen’s death brought this to the surface

The longer material accompanying that email explains why the events of 8–9 September 2022 resonated so strongly.

I shared a story from the Hellenic Genealogy Geek Facebook community about a Greek migrant who had arrived in Australia in 1960. He treasured the booklet he received upon naturalisation as an Australian citizen and British subject. He kept it carefully wrapped in plastic until his death in 2014 and showed it to his grandchildren.

The point of that story wasn’t a political argument about republicanism or monarchy.

It was what the booklet represented to a young migrant who had come from poverty, war and hardship: welcome, opportunity, belonging and dignity.

Another child of Greek migrants responded that her own father had kept the same booklet among his treasured possessions. She remembered her parents as:

“honourable hardworking and respectful people”

who instilled filotimo and respect in their children.

The original writer replied:

“Φιλότιμο and respect… they seem to be fading away… Let’s all try to maintain these values…”

That exchange affected me because I knew exactly what they meant.

That was my father. That is my mother.

And so I asked Professor Ramsay:

“Will ACU leaders and colleagues start to repair the trust I had so willingly given for twenty years?”

This wasn’t an abstract philosophical question. I was asking whether dignity, respect, trust, integrity and filotimo could be demonstrated through action - including supporting my recovery and my return to work as per statutory obligations require.

I ended with two questions for a professor of ethics:

“What is the truth?”

and:

“What defines courage?”

——

The contradiction I was trying to expose

The accompanying letter went much further.

I wrote about gaslighting, mobbing, fear and the continuing psychological consequences of what had happened. I said that supporting my recovery and implementing the injury management plan would bring an end to the fear and risks to my safety and wellbeing.

To me, this was a test of ACU’s Catholic identity.

I wrote that supporting recovery would:

“support the mission, values and Catholic ethos of the university.”

And:

“It demonstrates the university’s integrity.”

That remains important.

——

Values are not demonstrated by publishing them. They are demonstrated by what an institution does when applying them is difficult.

What are our values worth when keeping them costs us something?

——

The Justice and Peace Office

Later that same morning, on 9 September 2022, I forwarded the material to the Justice and Peace Office.

I did so deliberately.

I told them that what was happening was relevant to their commitment to social justice because the injustice I was describing was occurring within an institution of the Catholic Church.

By then, my distrust of regulatory systems had become profound. I wrote that I had received a letter from the Fair Work Ombudsman but was frightened even to open it because previous regulatory experiences had become triggers for trauma.

That detail says something about how far things had deteriorated.

A letter arriving in the mail shouldn’t have been frightening.

Yet I was contemplating travelling to my federal MP’s office in Kogarah simply so that I wouldn’t have to open the envelope alone.

I wrote:

“I’m alone, frightened and vulnerable.”

And yet I was still looking for an institution - somewhere - that would demonstrate that systems of accountability could work.

I described the Fair Work Ombudsman at that point as my “last hope of restoring trust and integrity in the government system.” *

I ended that message with words that capture much of what I had been trying to communicate:

“Hypocrisy needs to be replaced by integrity.”

* The Fair Work Ombudsman failed to restore trust and integrity in the government system - see http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2026/09/the-fair-work-ombudsman-when-another.html

——

Twelve hours after my father’s death

The email then returned to one of the most painful experiences of my life.

I wrote about my father’s suicide and what occurred approximately 12 hours after his death.

I described my manager coming into my family home and approaching my mother about when I would return to work because it was a busy time of year and everybody was needed.

Three days?

A week?

My father had just died.

My family had barely begun to comprehend what had happened, let alone organise his funeral.

That memory sat behind my question in September 2022:

“Am I an exception for a support network from my university community?”

And then:

“I expect to return and recover in my job as a matter of principle, respect and dignity to the human person.”

I was not an exception to dignity.

“I’m not an exception to ACU’s identity and mission, nor the laws in our society.”

——

“Do we act on what we preach or not?”

My email of 23 September 2022 contained a question:

“Do we act on what we preach or not?”

That’s the thread running from 9 September to 23 September.

It connects my parents’ migration story with my father’s death.

It connects filotimo with Catholic social teaching.

It connects workplace health and safety with human dignity.

It connects institutional mission statements with the actual treatment of a human being.

And it connects ethics with courage.

I was asking people within a Catholic university and within Catholic social-justice structures not merely to sympathise with what I was saying, but to act consistently with the principles their institutions professed.

By 23 September 2022, I was exhausted. I wrote that I needed to pause from what I called a “battle of social injustice” because the continuing workplace situation had taken its toll.

But even then, I remained clear about what I wanted:

to return and recover in my job.

Because it was a legal obligation and dignity in the university mission should mean something.

——

The question remains

What strikes me is how many times I tried to communicate the same fundamental message through different languages.

Sometimes I spoke in the language of workplace health and safety.

Sometimes workers compensation.

Sometimes ethics.

Sometimes Catholic identity and mission.

Sometimes social justice.

Sometimes family.

Sometimes grief.

And sometimes through the Greek word that perhaps says it most simply:

Filotimo.

On 9 September 2022, I asked:

“What is the truth?”

I also asked:

“What defines courage?”

On 23 September 2022, I asked:

“Do we act on what we preach or not?”

Those are not three separate questions.

They are different versions of the same one.

When an institution speaks publicly about dignity, justice, ethics, compassion and the value of the human person, what happens when living those principles requires it to confront what has happened within its own community?

That’s when values cease to be words.

That’s when they are tested.

Source: contemporaneous record of events - Documents 473, 482