Employment lawyer #2 - Part 1 - 2020

On 15 January 2020, enter employment lawyer #2 putting the university on notice. 

That HR associate director actually wrote the following in the email response to the solicitor. “Further to my phone message, can you please advise whether Vicki intends to attend the IMA on 21 January as outlined in the letter you refer to from 9 January 2020. You will appreciate that if the University does not cancel the appointment in advance, a significant cost will still need to be paid”. 

How significant has the cost been for the university, by HR executive staff, to destroy my life, defrauding me of all my leave entitlements (personal, annual and long service leave), income, superannuation, livelihood, worker’s compensation fraud and likely more in suspected coercion, influence, aiding, abetting etc. of others, to collude in such destruction? 

The financial abuse and exploitation alone should be taken extremely seriously, as well as contraventions of WHS laws. 

That’s all I have to say in this post. It’s a short post, but it says a lot. 

This post is based on documents 32-34 between 15 January 2020 and 18 February 2020. It displays adverse action for requesting generally protected workplace rights, discrimination, deception, malicious and vexatious conduct that condones engaging in WHS breaches and creating psychosocial hazards, not managing the risks as the PCBU is reasonably expected to do so, BY LAW. 

I will say this, like a broken record. Because that’s the truth as per my volume of evidence. The university repeatedly refused to cooperate and follow standard policies and procedures, proving contraventions in multiple laws, refusing to comply with regulations and creating a huge mountain out of something that was serious but simple to resolve. Why would a university with a Mission like no other university, do this? 

And who was the unethical psycho that was a “significant cost” to the university? See http://mystory-myvoice.blogspot.com/2025/02/hr-associate-director-unfit-to-do.html. 

How much was the “significant cost” the university were willing to pay for fraud by deception?